LAST year was notable for leadership changes in many countries around the world, including China and the U.S. The 2012 elections in those two countries are bound to influence the future development of the world’s most important bilateral relationship.
A review of the past year shows that China-U.S. relations have had their ups and downs. Low points include the usual bout of “China-bashing” in the U.S. election, and politically motivated investigations into Chinese companies in America. The U.S. is also shifting its military focus from the Middle East to Asia, a development that worries the Chinese media. China has nevertheless judiciously and responsibly advanced under the principle of “harmony in diversity” bilateral ties according to the set strategy of building a new type of bilateral relationship befitting the world’s two great powers.
Political Relations amid Elections
In 2012 the China-U.S. relationship enjoyed several high-profile exchanges, starting with Chinese Vice President Xi Jinping’s state visit to the United States. The significance of Xi’s trip was further highlighted by its coinciding with the 40th anniversary of U.S. President Nixon’s visit to China and the release of the Shanghai Communiqué signed by both countries. During his visit, Xi traversed the United States to attend 27 formal events. He communicated and interacted with people representing a broad swath of American society. In the course of Xi’s visit the two sides widened their areas of consensus, expanded their economic and trade cooperation into more fields, deepened people-to-people relationships and strengthened their dialogue on international and regional issues. What’s more, in his public speeches Xi defined bilateral ties as a new type of great power relationship for the 21st century that aims to bring benefits to the people of the two countries and maintain and contribute to the peace, stability and development of the Asia-Pacific region and the world. This new tone has helped steer China-U.S. relations out of the plights of 2012 and counteract uncertainties brought about by the U.S. presidential election.
Although national elections are prone to turn countries’ attention away from foreign affairs to some degree, 2012 top-level exchanges between China and the United State were frequent. Chinese President Hu Jintao met with his U.S. counterpart Barack Obama twice; Premier Wen Jiabao met Obama once; U.S. Secretary of State Hilary Clinton visited China four times; U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta visited China once; U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner paid three visits to China and top military and foreign affairs officials from both sides conducted seven extensive telephone dialogues. All these top-level exchanges ensured the two sides were able to deal appropriately with problems as they arose.
During the U.S. election campaigns, candidates for the presidency, senate and state governorships all touched on issues concerning China. Often, in order to appeal to the conservative electorate, candidates heaped excessive blame on China for the U.S.’s economic woes and promoted the “China threat” theory.
All this fuss about China has undoubtedly exposed certain prejudice and stereotypes that American society harbors toward China. However, we should also recognize that China bashing merely acted as a scapegoat in discussions of the “economy and employment,” central themes in the U.S. elections. The strategic significance of bilateral relations is too great to be weakened by election campaigns, however. To revitalize a struggling economy and maintain global leadership, the U.S. without doubt needs the cooperation of China. For this reason, mutual respect and mutual benefit should characterize the relationship in years to come.
Economic and Trade Relations Count
China-U.S. economic and trade exchanges have played an active role in stabilizing bilateral relations. According to statistics released by China’s Ministry of Commerce, in the first 10 months of 2012, bilateral trade volumes grew steadily, registering a year-on-year increase of 9.1 percent. However, at the same time, the two sides have also experienced growing contradictions and friction in the economic field. In the wake of the global financial crisis, the U.S. economy’s recovery has been sluggish, while China’s has maintained robust growth. This striking contrast has heightened the sense of crisis in the U.S. Against this backdrop, the U.S. has attempted to weaken China’s comparative advantage by questioning the RMB exchange rate, China’s labor rights and environmental protection. Accusing China of manipulating the RMB exchange rate, artificially lowering labor costs and polluting the environment does nothing to help bilateral ties. In the long term, these three issues could potentially be the catalysts for China-U.S. economic and trade conflicts. Besides, all three issues point to the underlying cause of contention: the U.S. structural trade deficit.
One notable development in recent times has been the solidification of a political barrier preventing Chinese direct investment in the U.S. Such a barrier has become a major source of contention in bilateral trade and economic relations.
In 2012, two outstanding Chinese enterprises, Huawei and ZTE, were investigated by the U.S. senate and accused of potentially jeopardizing U.S. national security. The Obama administration then intervened to prevent China’s SANY Group from establishing a factory in the country. SANY resorted to legal proceedings to defend its rights. Unfair treatment of foreign companies in the U.S. reflects the power that special interest groups hold over U.S. politicians, and the fragility of the country’s declining economy. The bright side is that Chinese enterprises have begun to develop a better understanding of the impartial U.S. legal system and, in some cases, to use it to their advantage.
The new challenges in China-U.S. economic and trade relations indicate that the devil is in the detail – ties are generally healthy, but minor bickering has the potential to flare up. It is crucial that both sides bring a positive, cooperative mindset to the negotiation table; the vitality of this new great power economic relationship will directly influence the word economy.
New Great Power Relationship Strengthens China-U.S. Ties
Bilateral Military and Security Ties against a New Backdrop
As Hilary Clinton stated in an article published in Foreign Affairs, the United States is creating an American Pacific Age in the new century. Facing the rising political and economic significance of the Asia-Pacific region, the U.S. is fully aware that it is in danger of losing its global leadership role if it is absent from the region. With this reality in mind, the Obama administration has begun to cast its attention on the region, and exercise a so-called “rebalance” strategy.
In implementing this strategy, the U.S. has attempted to seek new alliances while consolidating its traditional ones. It has sought an increasingly active role in regional affairs by, for instance, intervening in such issues as the territoriality of the South China Sea and the Diaoyu Islands. The U.S.’s actions have stoked China’s concerns about its national security in the region.
In spite of this strategy of “rebalance,” China-U.S. military exchanges have seen sustained development. In May 2012, Liang Guanglie, Chinese Minister of National Defense, visited the U.S. – the first visit by a Chinese Minister of National Defense in nine years. In August, Cai Yingting, deputy chief of the General Staff of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), also visited the U.S. In September, U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta paid his first visit to China since taking on the post. In mid-December, Qi Jianguo, another deputy chief from the PLA General Staff, traveled to the U.S. as the head of a delegation to join James N. Miller, the U.S. Defense Under Secretary, in co-presiding over the 13th China-U.S. Defense Consultations. Besides high-level exchanges, the two sides have been engaged in exchanges on military systems and communications between colleges and research institutes. Plans are also in the works to carry out anti-piracy joint exercises. From November 29 to 30, 2012, a China-U.S. joint humanitarian assistance and disaster relief tabletop exercise was conducted in Chengdu, Sichuan Province.
Objectively speaking, it is inevitable that the U.S. strategy of “rebalancing” in the Asia-Pacific should aggravate bilateral military suspicions. Therefore, multi-level and multi-aspect bilateral military contact and interactions are necessary to help relieve military tensions between the two sides. Only when both are clued-in on their counterparts’ military and strategic intentions and capabilities can the leaderships make proper decisions that benefit the two countries and their peoples, and lower to zero the likelihood of military confrontation.
Booming Exchanges in Humanistic Sectors
Bilateral exchanges in humanistic sectors have played a critical role throughout the history of China-U.S. relations. The Ping Pong Diplomacy 40 years ago can be taken as an excellent example. In November 2009, state leaders of the two sides jointly made the decision to establish a high-level humanistic exchange consultation mechanism to strengthen communications and cooperation in a range of humanistic sectors such as education, science and technology, culture, women’s issues, youth and sport. The third China-U.S. high-level consultation on people-to-people exchanges kicked off in Beijing on May 3, 2012. Chinese State Councillor Liu Yandong and U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton co-chaired the event.
According to official statistics, prior to the 2012 high-level consultation, 33 of the 41 proposals generated by the second round of the consultation had been implemented. For example, China’s programs to send 10,000 students to the U.S. for doctorate study and sponsor 10,000 Americans to study in China resulted in 4,000 Chinese students benefiting from the U.S. education system and financed 7,000 American students on the “Chinese Bridge” program. Meanwhile, the U.S. also made headway in its program to send 100,000 students to study in Chinese institutions. By May 2012, 23,000 students had come to China under the program.
On November 3, 2012, the inauguration ceremony of the China-U.S. Humanistic Exchange Research Base was held at Peking University. The base aims to carry out cross-cultural and interdisciplinary research. Since its establishment, it has been engaged in cooperative scientific research, academic exchanges and media coverage. Its operation helps to enhance mutual trust and friendship between the two countries’ peoples, eliminates prejudice and misunderstanding and promotes the healthy development of bilateral relations.
Humanistic exchanges alongside political trust and economic cooperation constitute the major pillars of China-U.S. relations.Towards a New-type Great Power Relations
Barack Obama’s winning a second presidential term and the CPC successfully convening its 18th national congress signify a new era in China-U.S. relations. Throughout the evolutionary process of these relations, the two countries have never confronted such complicated tasks as they do today. In the past the two countries struggled to gain a balance between competition and cooperation, between challenges and opportunities, and between crises and stability. The question of how to maintain mutual respect and achieve mutual beneficial results in competition and cooperation will test the leadership on both sides of the Pacific. Perhaps, “seeking harmony in diversity” will become the principle by which the two countries achieve mutual respect and mutual benefit. On one hand, the two sides should expand their cooperation, stressing common benefits. On the other, they should also respect each other’s unique characteristics. Only in this way can the two countries peacefully co-exist.
For current China-U.S. ties, this new type of great power relationship has the potential to provide a proper framework for trends in future development marked by healthy competition, rather than confrontation.
Though tensions still exist between the two countries, such as those generated by the U.S.’s “rebalance” strategy in the Asia Pacific, their political consensus, mutual interests in economic cooperation and growing momentum in bilateral humanistic exchanges bespeak their interdependence.
The great power relationship refers to both countries and emphasizes that they should uphold international law and take on joint responsibilities in the world community.
By and large this means a strong America, but it also implies a new role for China as the other half of the great power relationship. China needs to adapt to its new role by learning from other countries, accumulating experiences, actively seeking a rebalance with its neighbors and ensuring that the benefits of its rise are felt across the globe.
DIAO DAMING is an assistant research fellow at the Institute of American Studies under the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.
it was publish 2011 , janawary .
बिहि, चैत्र २६, २०७१ मा प्रकाशित
यसमा तपाइको प्रतिक्रिया
अन्य Uncategorized समाचार
Like us On Facebook
Follow Us On TwitterTweets by @mirmireonline
ह्यारी ट्रुम्यानदेखि डोनल्ड ट्रम्पसम्म, सबै अमेरिकी राष्ट्रपतिहरूलाई पारमाणविक हमला भएको खण्डमा ‘बङ्कर’मा बस्ने सुविधा
२००७ साल कात्तिक २२ गते राजा त्रिभुवन नारायणहिटी दरबारबाट भागेर भारतीय दूतावासमा शरण लिँदादेखि
२०५२ साल ० फागुन १ ः नेकपा माओवादीद्वारा ‘प्रतिक्रियावादी राज्यसत्तालाई ध्वंस गर्दै नयाँ जनवादी सत्ताको
-उदय बहादुर चलाउने 'दीपक'
संयुक्त जनमोर्चा नेपाल तत्कालीन माओवादी पार्टीको वैधानिक मोर्चा थियो । पार्टीको नीति र कार्यक्रम